Viper Sniper is a hybrid V8–WASM routing engine.
Every decision is benchmarked, governed, and fail-closed — by design.
Built for people who would rather miss a trade than take one on uncertain state.
Viper Sniper is built for time-critical market entries such as new token launches, liquidity additions, and high-competition price dislocations.
It executes only when state is provably consistent — otherwise it aborts.
Designed to compete for same-block or near-block entries without sacrificing state correctness.
Most trading systems are built for demo environments.
They assume clean data, orderly timestamps, and predictable timing. Under those conditions, everything works. Then the system touches real markets.
Bursts of data arrive where there used to be quiet. Functions that "always finish in time" don't. Providers hiccup silently. Corrections arrive after logic has already fired. The system doesn't crash.
It just stops being correct.
The most dangerous failures are the ones that don't announce themselves. Async drift between components that should be synchronised. Race conditions that occur intermittently. Events that arrive out of order and break assumptions that were never made explicit.
Logs look normal. Metrics stay green. Behaviour quietly diverges.
Teams respond by optimising.
They tune parameters. They chase latency. Benchmarks improve. The benchmarks are lies.
Real conditions include garbage collection pauses, memory pressure, network jitter, and scheduler unpredictability. Benchmarks exclude all of these by design. Worse, many "optimisations" trade determinism for speed. A non-blocking read shaves milliseconds but introduces ordering ambiguity.
Fast and wrong is worse than slow and right.
Then there is intelligence.
Adaptive systems can learn the wrong lesson. But the real danger is not learning — it's overriding. When intelligence is allowed to bypass a safety check because it "knows better," authority transfers from logic to inference.
Rules are auditable. Models are not. Rules fail predictably. Models fail in ways that cannot be anticipated.
Most systems are built for the happy path. They assume success and treat failure as an exception.
This is backwards.
Systems should assume failure and prove otherwise. Every execution path should answer one question:
What happens when this doesn't work?
If the answer is "it probably will," the design is incomplete.
The world the system sees is the world it acts on.
No drift. No mid-cycle surprises.
The limit wins. Always.
Intelligence without constraint is unbounded risk.
Every time. No exceptions.
If validation cannot complete, execution cannot begin.
Fast and wrong is not fast. It is wrong that happens quickly.
Abort means abort.
The difference between controlled failure and uncontrolled loss.
Problems are visible — or they are unacceptable.
All performance characteristics are measured, benchmarked, and enforced.
Nothing shown here is theoretical.
Incremental O(1) hot-path execution
| Operation | Full recalc (μs) | Incremental (μs) | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|
| VWAP | ~235 | ~0.48 | ~494× |
Deterministic engine routing
| Operation | Mode | Engine | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMA / EMA | Batch | V8-JIT | Faster for simple arithmetic |
| VWAP | Large batch | WASM | Faster for complex math |
| All indicators | Tick | Incremental | O(1) latency under load |
Trigger-time latency
| Path | Avg latency |
|---|---|
| RPC execution | ~99 ms |
| Pre-signed cache hit | ~1.6 μs |
Enforced safety & determinism
| Domain | Tests | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Frozen Data Zone (FDZ) | 50 | Prevent execution drift |
| Guardrails | 16 | Enforce safety dominance |
| Property-based invariants | 51 | Bound correctness |
| Orchestrator | 52 | Enforce routing rules |
Access is staged because failure is assumed, not ignored.
Trading systems do not fail because too few people use them.
They fail when usage outpaces understanding.
Access is gated to ensure:
Visibility before execution. Everything is observable.
Full pipeline, no market impact. The goal is behavioural understanding.
Gradual introduction. If anything behaves unexpectedly, access contracts.
This system provides structural integrity — not guarantees.
Markets remain adversarial. Capital remains at risk. Responsibility remains with the operator.
Access is priced at an infrastructure tier and shared during onboarding.
You'll receive an email with next steps.